|
|||
|
Stonewall Elementary School Comprehensive
School Improvement Plan School
Years 2004-06 Plan
Approved by the School Council: March 16, 2004 School
Council Members James
E. McCaw, Principal Comprehensive
School Improvement Plan
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Priority
Need
|
Goal
|
|||||||||||
|
As
of winter 2004:
On
the KCCT given in spring of 2003, students scored:
|
By spring, 2005:
By
spring, 2006, on the KCCT, our students will:
|
|||||||||||
Causes of the Need
|
Objectives
for Reaching the Goal |
|||||||||||
|
·
Our SRI and StarMath scores are excellent. More attention will be given to making sure that students
scoring below grade level receive appropriate interventions. ·
Scores on the KCCT were excellent in the multiple- choice
sections in math and reading, but were hurt by student performance
on open response questions. ·
Writing portfolio and on-demand scores have improved, but are
still well below the level of reading and math scores. Portfolio pieces and on-demand writing prompts have
not been used in conjunction with the standard scoring guides by all
levels. These types of
writing need to be integrated more effectively into the curriculum
instead of being taught as a separate subject.
|
A. Students scoring below grade level will increase scores on SRI and StarMath by 10 NCE’s between the fall and spring testing. B.
Student scores on the open-response part of the KCCT will
increase to 3.0 out of a possible 4.0. C.
On writing portfolios, student scoring in the
novice/apprentice range will be reduced from 73% to 50% by April
2006. D. On on-demand writing, our students scoring in the novice/apprentice range will be reduced from 95% to 70%. |
|||||||||||
|
Objective
A:
Students scoring
below grade level will increase scores on SRI and StarMath by 10
NCE’s between the fall and spring testing. |
||||||
|
Activity |
Measure |
Responsible
Person |
Start
Date |
End
Date |
Cost |
Fund
Source |
|
Reading
Tutor will be purchased to work with students in Grades 1 and 2 who
are performing below grade level in reading. |
Gates;
series tests; SRI |
Reading
Tutor |
Aug.
2004 |
May
2006 |
$13,000 |
Parks/Rec
Donation; Sec. 6A |
|
Principal
will meet with grade levels after the fall and winter testing
windows to review the SRI and StarMath scores in order to develop
plans for students scoring below grade level.
These plans will consider including a technology component. |
Meeting
notes and plans |
Principal
and teachers; STC |
Sept.
2004 |
May
2006 |
None |
NA |
|
Teachers
will incorporate ideas from the Parent Involvement Kit in order to
fully inform and involve parents in helping their children to
increase achievement in reading and math. |
Grade
Level Meeting held with parents |
Grade
level teachers |
Aug.
2004 |
Continuing |
None |
(We
have the kit) |
|
Objective
B: Student scores on the open-response part of the KCCT
will increase to 3.0 out of a possible 4.0. |
||||||
|
Activity |
Measure |
Responsible
Person |
Start
Date |
End
Date |
Cost |
Fund
Source |
|
Open
Response Questions will be used at all grade levels as a standard
means of assessing students. |
Teacher
Plans |
Teachers |
Aug.
2004 |
May
2006 |
None |
NA |
|
Teachers
at each grade level will meet regularly to develop open response
questions and scoring guidelines in the areas corresponding to the
curriculum map. |
Teacher
plans |
Teachers |
Aug.
2004 |
May
2006 |
None |
NA |
|
Teachers
will use open response questions that require higher order thinking
skills from Bloom’s Taxonomy. |
Teacher
Plans |
Teachers |
Aug.
2004 |
May
2006 |
None |
NA |
|
The
Principal and the PSA will collect open response assessments and
review them with the grade level teachers to identify students
performing below grade level and to develop plans for improvement. |
Meeting
Notes |
Principal
and PSA |
Aug.
2004 |
May
2006 |
None |
NA |
|
Objective
C:
On writing portfolios, student scoring in the
novice/apprentice range will be reduced from 73% to 50% by April
2006. |
||||||
|
Activity |
Measure |
Responsible
Person |
Start
Date |
End
Date |
Cost |
Fund
Source |
|
Students
at each grade level will produce writing portfolios that will be
passed along to the next grade level. |
Student
product; teacher plans |
Teachers
and students |
Aug.
2004 |
May
2006 |
None |
NA |
|
Teachers
will participate in a professional development session on developing
writing portfolios presented by Columbia University. |
PD
Plans |
PD
Committee; Teachers; Principal |
Summer
2004 |
Same |
$1500 |
PD
Funds |
|
Teachers
will incorporate ideas from the Parent Involvement Kit to inform and
involve parents about writing portfolios. |
Grade
Level Meeting |
Grade
Level Teachers |
Aug.
2004 |
Contin-uing |
None |
NA |
|
Intermediate
students will use technology (e.g. word processing) to develop,
revise, and edit their portfolios.
The skills to begin this process will be taught throughout
the primary years. |
Student
Product; technology class plans |
Technology
Teacher; Teachers |
Aug.
2004 |
May
2006 |
None |
NA |
|
Teachers
will use the holistic scoring guide during the development of the
portfolios. |
Teacher
Plans; grades |
Teachers |
Aug.
2004 |
May
2006 |
None |
NA |
|
Objective
D:
On on-demand writing, our students scoring in the
novice/apprentice range will be reduced from 95% to 70%. |
||||||
|
Activity |
Measure |
Responsible
Person |
Start
Date |
End
Date |
Cost |
Fund
Source |
|
Teachers
will use on-demand writing as part of the assessment for the units
they are teaching. |
Teacher
Plans |
Teachers |
Aug.
2004 |
May
2006 |
None |
NA |
|
Teachers
will use the holistic scoring guide to score the on-demand pieces. |
Teacher
plans; grades |
Teachers |
Aug.
2004 |
May
2006 |
None |
NA |
|
The
Principal and the PSA will meet with grade level teachers to review
on-demand pieces to identify students performing below grade level
and to develop plans for improvement. |
Principal
plans; grade level notes and plans |
Principal;
PSA; teachers |
Aug.
2004 |
May
2006 |
None |
NA |
|
Priority
Need |
Goal |
|
Disaggregated
data show that achievement gaps exist between majority/minority
students and low/high SES students.
Teachers will continue to concentrate on increasing
achievement in those students performing below grade level. While
we are no longer a magnet school, we recognize that a diverse
student/family population contributes positively to our overall
school climate and student achievement, so we will continue to make
efforts to attract minority families to Stonewall. High
expectations of all students is a core value of Stonewall School.
These expectations will be communicated by the staff to
parents and students. |
By
May of 2006, the achievement gap in reading and math will be reduced
by 5 NCE’s as measured by the SRI and StarMath Tests.
Our
present minority population is 17%.
We will plan on increasing that figure to 20% by May of 2006.
|
|
Causes
of the Need |
Objectives
for Reaching the Goal |
|
Achievement
gaps are a problem throughout the USA.
While there are many ideas on why this has happened, we can
only deal with the fact that it exists and eliminate it through the
execution of our plans to increase student achievement. Our
school is in a community made up of largely majority families.
Since we are not a magnet school, we hope to attract families
to attend Stonewall as out-of-district if there is available room. Fayette
County has 26% minority students and Stonewall has 17%. Having
high expectations of all students by our staff and our parents is
necessary to improve overall student achievement and to close
achievement gaps. |
A.
Minority student scores on the SRI and StarMath tests will
improve by 10 NCE’s. B.
Stonewall will explore ways of attracting and keeping
minority families. C.
Stonewall teachers will effectively communicate the
expectation of high standards of learning to parents and students. |
|
Objective
A:
Minority student
scores on the SRI and StarMath tests will improve by 10 NCE’s. |
||||||
|
Activity |
Measure |
Responsible
Person |
Start
Date |
End
Date |
Cost |
Fund
Source |
|
The
principal will review disaggregated data with the grade levels to
assess achievement by each demographic group and make plans for
improvement. |
SRI
and StarMath |
Principal |
Sept.
2004 |
May
2006 |
None |
NA |
|
Teachers
will utilize the Parent Involvement Kit in order to make sure that
minority families are informed and involved with their children’s
academic success. |
Parent
meetings |
Teachers
and Parents |
Aug.
2004 |
Continu-ing |
None |
NA |
Teachers
will meet regularly to determine that each student is being served
appropriately, e.g. ESS, ESL, reading tutor, SAT, IEP, 504, Quest,
Talent Pool, etc.
|
Teacher
Plans |
Teachers |
Aug.
2004 |
May
2006 |
None
|
NA |
Professional
Development activities will be offered, including culturally
responsive instruction and learning.
|
Session
notes |
PD
Committee |
May
2004 |
May
2005 |
None |
NA |
|
Objective
B:
Stonewall will
explore ways of attracting and keeping minority families. |
||||||
|
Activity |
Measure |
Responsible
Person |
Start
Date |
End
Date |
Cost |
Fund
Source |
|
The
Principal will contact the Central Office person responsible for
out-of-district applications to see if there are any minority
families interested in attending Stonewall. |
An
increase in out-of-district apps. |
|||||